All Relations between semantics and right cerebral hemisphere

Publication Sentence Publish Date Extraction Date Species
Gwen L Schmidt, Casey J DeBuse, Carol A Sege. Right hemisphere metaphor processing? Characterizing the lateralization of semantic processes. Brain and language. vol 100. issue 2. 2007-05-30. PMID:17292739. we found a right hemisphere advantage for unfamiliar sentences containing distant semantic relationships, and a left hemisphere advantage for familiar sentences containing close semantic relationships, regardless of whether sentences were metaphorical or literal. 2007-05-30 2023-08-12 Not clear
Gwen L Schmidt, Casey J DeBuse, Carol A Sege. Right hemisphere metaphor processing? Characterizing the lateralization of semantic processes. Brain and language. vol 100. issue 2. 2007-05-30. PMID:17292739. this pattern of results is consistent with theories postulating predominantly left hemisphere processing of close semantic relationships and predominantly right hemisphere processing of distant semantic relationships. 2007-05-30 2023-08-12 Not clear
Sarah Bouaffre, Frédérique Faïta-Ainseb. Hemispheric differences in the time-course of semantic priming processes: evidence from event-related potentials (ERPs). Brain and cognition. vol 63. issue 2. 2007-04-12. PMID:17207563. in the right visual field/left hemisphere, both n400 and late positive component (lpc/p600) were modulated by semantic relatedness, while only a late effect was present in the left visual field/ right hemisphere. 2007-04-12 2023-08-12 Not clear
C Spironelli, B Penolazzi, C Vio, A Angrill. Inverted EEG theta lateralization in dyslexic children during phonological processing. Neuropsychologia. vol 44. issue 14. 2006-12-12. PMID:16876830. dyslexics evidenced an altered pattern of theta activation both in the temporal dimension and in the cortical space: their peak of activity was delayed to the first inter stimulus interval after word offset and was shifted to the right hemisphere throughout the whole epoch of phonological task and in two phases of the semantic task. 2006-12-12 2023-08-12 human
Daniel G Dillon, Julie J Cooper, Tineke Grent-'t-Jong, Marty G Woldorff, Kevin S LaBa. Dissociation of event-related potentials indexing arousal and semantic cohesion during emotional word encoding. Brain and cognition. vol 62. issue 1. 2006-12-07. PMID:16678953. differences in lpp amplitude elicited by emotional versus uncategorized neutral stimuli were evident from 450 to 1000 ms. from 450 to 700 ms, lpp effects at midline and right hemisphere frontal electrodes indexed arousal, whereas lpp effects at left hemisphere centro-parietal electrodes indexed semantic cohesion. 2006-12-07 2023-08-12 Not clear
Argyris K Stringaris, Nicholas Medford, Rachel Giora, Vincent C Giampietro, Michael J Brammer, Anthony S Davi. How metaphors influence semantic relatedness judgments: the role of the right frontal cortex. NeuroImage. vol 33. issue 2. 2006-11-21. PMID:16963282. we argue that these results are consistent with the notion of semantic open-endedness, whereby figurative statements bias cognitive processing towards a search for a wider range of semantic relationships compared to literal statements, and thus lend further support to the view that coarse semantic coding occurs preferentially in the right hemisphere. 2006-11-21 2023-08-12 human
A Rand Coleman, J Michael William. The attenuation of auditory neglect by implicit cues. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS. vol 12. issue 5. 2006-10-10. PMID:16961946. this study examined implicit semantic and rhyming cues on perception of auditory stimuli among nonaphasic participants who suffered a lesion of the right cerebral hemisphere and auditory neglect of sound perceived by the left ear. 2006-10-10 2023-08-12 human
Burkhard Maess, Christoph S Herrmann, Anja Hahne, Akinori Nakamura, Angela D Friederic. Localizing the distributed language network responsible for the N400 measured by MEG during auditory sentence processing. Brain research. vol 1096. issue 1. 2006-09-08. PMID:16769041. the findings reveal a clear left-hemispheric dominance during language processing indicated firstly by the mere number of activated regions (four in the left vs. two in the right hemisphere) and secondly by the observed specificity of the left inferior frontal rois to semantic violations. 2006-09-08 2023-08-12 human
Janet Hui-Wen Hsiao, Richard Shillcock, Michal Lavido. A TMS examination of semantic radical combinability effects in Chinese character recognition. Brain research. vol 1078. issue 1. 2006-07-06. PMID:16499892. thus, according to the split fovea assumption, the semantic and phonetic radicals are initially projected to and processed in the right hemisphere and the left hemisphere, respectively. 2006-07-06 2023-08-12 human
Miriam Geal-Dor, Yury Kamenir, Harvey Babkof. Event related potentials (ERPs) and behavioral responses: comparison of tonal stimuli to speech stimuli in phonological and semantic tasks. Journal of basic and clinical physiology and pharmacology. vol 16. issue 2-3. 2005-12-12. PMID:16285466. in contrast, p300 amplitude recorded to both the phonological and semantic targets was significantly larger over the left hemisphere than over the right hemisphere at the parietal electrodes. 2005-12-12 2023-08-12 human
Anna Rita Giovagnol. Characteristics of verbal semantic impairment in left hemisphere epilepsy. Neuropsychology. vol 19. issue 4. 2005-11-07. PMID:16060825. in comparison with the controls and right hemisphere patients, the left hemisphere patients showed impairments on picture naming and the semantic questionnaire. 2005-11-07 2023-08-12 human
L K Pilgrim, H E Moss, L K Tyle. Semantic processing of living and nonliving concepts across the cerebral hemispheres. Brain and language. vol 94. issue 1. 2005-08-31. PMID:15896386. our prediction was supported, in that semantic decisions to nonliving concepts were significantly slower and more error-prone when presented to the right hemisphere. 2005-08-31 2023-08-12 human
Sophie van Rijn, André Aleman, Eric van Diessen, Celine Berckmoes, Guy Vingerhoets, René S Kah. What is said or how it is said makes a difference: role of the right fronto-parietal operculum in emotional prosody as revealed by repetitive TMS. The European journal of neuroscience. vol 21. issue 11. 2005-08-24. PMID:15978028. we investigated the role of the fronto-parietal operculum, a somatosensory area where the lips, tongue and jaw are represented, in the right hemisphere to detection of emotion in prosody vs. semantics. 2005-08-24 2023-08-12 human
Seana Coulson, Ying Choon W. Right hemisphere activation of joke-related information: an event-related brain potential study. Journal of cognitive neuroscience. vol 17. issue 3. 2005-05-27. PMID:15814008. two studies tested the hypothesis that the right hemisphere engages in relatively coarse semantic coding that aids high-level language tasks such as joke comprehension. 2005-05-27 2023-08-12 human
S Zhou, W Zhou, X Che. Spatiotemporal analysis of ERP during chinese idiom comprehension. Brain topography. vol 17. issue 1. 2005-04-08. PMID:15669753. spm(t) presented significant differences in multiple regions in 3 stages: (1) during 120-150 ms, the early right hemispheric negativities (erhn) inboth frontal and temporoparietal areas were likely to reflect both initial syntactic processing and visual word-form mismatch; (2) during 320-380 ms (the n400 stage), negative deflections in left frontal, left anterior temporal, centrofrontal regions might coordinate and integrate both syntactic and semantic analysis in extensive right hemisphere; (3) during 480-540 ms (the p600 stage), positive deflections in left temporoparietal and occipital regions seemed to reflect the reanalysis and the integration of word meanings to obtain the over all meaning of idioms. 2005-04-08 2023-08-12 human
Jillian Grose-Fifer, Diana Deaco. Priming by natural category membership in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychologia. vol 42. issue 14. 2004-12-30. PMID:15381025. this finding was interpreted within our recent model of semantic memory wherein the right hemisphere represents items on the basis of distributed individual features, whereas the left hemisphere (lh) represents semantic information locally, within a spreading activation system, where priming occurs exclusively through associative links. 2004-12-30 2023-08-12 Not clear
Bram Goldstein, John E Obrzut, Cameron John, Jill V Hunter, Carol L Armstron. The impact of low-grade brain tumors on verbal fluency performance. Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology. vol 26. issue 6. 2004-12-02. PMID:15370373. we examined 25 left hemisphere (lh) and 26 right hemisphere (rh) low-grade brain tumor patients on semantic and phonemic fluency. 2004-12-02 2023-08-12 Not clear
Gwen A Frishkoff, Don M Tucker, Colin Davey, Michael Scher. Frontal and posterior sources of event-related potentials in semantic comprehension. Brain research. Cognitive brain research. vol 20. issue 3. 2004-10-18. PMID:15268912. left hemisphere activity preceded right hemisphere activity, and semantic effects in frontal regions began earlier and were more sustained than the transient effects within posterior cortical regions. 2004-10-18 2023-08-12 human
Diana Deacon, Jillian Grose-Fifer, Chien-Ming Yang, Virginia Stanick, Sean Hewitt, Anna Dynowsk. Evidence for a new conceptualization of semantic representation in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior. vol 40. issue 3. 2004-09-23. PMID:15259327. together, the two experiments support the theory that, in the right hemisphere, semantic memories are represented within a distributed system, on the basis of semantic features, whereas, in the left hemisphere representations are, as in local models, relatively more holistic, and are connected via associative links. 2004-09-23 2023-08-12 Not clear
Jary Larsen, Kathleen Baynes, Diane Swic. Right hemisphere reading mechanisms in a global alexic patient. Neuropsychologia. vol 42. issue 11. 2004-09-17. PMID:15246284. based on her ability to access lexical and semantic information without contacting phonological representations, we propose that ea's implicit reading emerges from, and is supported, by the right hemisphere. 2004-09-17 2023-08-12 Not clear